Call Us (877) 740-5028
Ransomware appeared in 48% of breaches in the 2026 Verizon DBIR, up from 44% the year before. The increase reinforces why ransomware belongs in both prevention and recovery planning.
Even strong defenses cannot eliminate every disruption. Businesses need controls that can stop or contain an attack in progress, along with a tested plan for restoring operations if prevention is bypassed or another failure takes systems offline.
That is the idea behind endpoint protection and recovery: two different jobs that only work well together. Endpoint protection lowers exposure and limits how much damage an attacker can do. Recovery gives a business a dependable path back to trusted data, applications, and devices once something goes wrong. Neither one substitutes for the other, and treating them as separate line items instead of one connected strategy leaves gaps that attackers are quick to exploit.
Endpoint protection is the set of tools and policies that watch over laptops, servers, and other devices to catch and stop threats before they spread. Recovery is the ability to restore clean data, systems, and services after something disrupts them, whether that is an attack, a hardware failure, or human error.
NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 groups cybersecurity into six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Endpoint protection supports the Protect, Detect, and Respond functions, while backup and restoration are part of recovery. The framework reinforces a simple point: Preventing and containing threats is only part of the job. Businesses also need a reliable way to recover when something still goes wrong.
Endpoint protection is not a backup. A backup, in turn, cannot detect malware, block an exploit, or isolate a compromised device on its own. Each layer does something the other cannot, which is why skipping either one can leave a resilience gap.
For a closer look at the endpoint security side of this strategy, read our guide on [What Is Endpoint Protection and Why Is It Important?]
Endpoints are no longer limited to office desktops. A typical business may have laptops, mobile devices, servers, virtual machines, and cloud workloads in use at the same time. Any one of them can become an entry point, so protection must cover the full environment.
Strong endpoint security usually combines several controls:
No single control can stop every attack. What matters is being able to see what is happening across devices and respond quickly when something looks wrong. Security teams need clear visibility into alerts, policy status, containment actions, and compliance reporting.
OTAVA’s managed Endpoint Protection brings those functions together through centralized monitoring, policy management, and threat containment. That makes it easier to manage protection consistently at scale.

Recovery is about more than having copies of files somewhere off to the side. A business may need to restore applications, system images, configurations, identity services, and the documentation required to rebuild critical systems. If any of those pieces are missing, recovery can stall even when the data itself is available.
That is why backup protection matters just as much as backup creation. CISA’s ransomware guidance recommends keeping offline, encrypted backups and testing them regularly for availability and integrity. Businesses can add another layer of protection through immutability, separate administrative credentials, least-privilege access, and multifactor authentication.
An endpoint backup is only useful if it can be restored when needed. Testing matters because ransomware may affect more than production systems. Attackers can also target backup environments and administrative access, which can leave a business with fewer clean recovery options.
Recent data from Sophos’s 2026 ransomware survey shows how often backups still play a role after an attack. Among surveyed organizations that experienced ransomware, 56% of attacks resulted in encrypted data. In cases where data was encrypted, 66% used backups as part of recovery. Sophos also found that 55% recovered within a week, while 16% recovered in less than a day. Average recovery costs reached $1.7 million.
However, having a backup does not automatically mean it is safe to restore. Teams still need to identify a known-clean recovery point and use security telemetry to understand when the compromise began. Restoring too early can bring malware, unsafe configurations, or compromised credentials back into production.
Identity systems need the same attention. Because Sophos identified compromised identities as the leading initial access vector in its 2026 dataset, clean recovery should also include reviewing privileged access, resetting affected credentials, and validating identity services before systems return to normal operation.
Ransomware recovery works best when it is planned long before an incident happens, not improvised in the middle of one. Splitting the work into three phases keeps everyone aligned on what to do and when.
Before an incident:
During an incident:
After containment:
When these pieces work together, the response is more coordinated. Teams can contain the threat, restore clean systems, and return the business to normal operations with fewer gaps or delays.
Operational resilience comes down to how well a business can keep critical services running during disruption and how quickly it can restore them when something goes down. Endpoint protection and recovery both contribute to that, but simply having the tools in place is not enough. Businesses also need a way to measure whether those tools and processes are working.
Useful indicators include:
These metrics show where the recovery process is dependable and where gaps may still exist. For example, a successful backup job says little if the backup cannot be restored within the required timeframe.
The same applies to business data recovery more broadly. Testing should reflect the kind of conditions teams may face, including compromised credentials, unavailable staff, remote endpoints, and attacks against backup systems. Exercises that only test ideal scenarios can give a false sense of readiness.
The goal is to know, before an incident happens, whether critical systems can be contained, restored, and returned to service in a controlled way.
At OTAVA, we help businesses connect managed endpoint protection with secure backup and recovery planning. That means combining threat visibility and containment with a recovery process that has been tested and can support a clean return to normal operations.
If reducing ransomware risk is a priority, contact our team. We can review your current endpoint security and recovery approach, identify weaknesses, and help you strengthen protection across critical systems.